🔗 Share this article

An legislator from NSW has utilized legislative immunity to disclose the name of a man previously accused in relation to the alleged kidnapping and murder of British toddler Cheryl Grimmer fifty-five years ago.

Vanishing at Fairy Meadow Beach

The young girl disappeared from near a shower block while with her parent and three older brothers at Fairy Meadow beach in the Illawarra region of New South Wales on 12 January 1970.

Legal Proceedings and Alias

The man, known under the alias “Mercury,” faced a court case in 2018 after pleading not guilty. However, the trial collapsed when a judge determined that a nineteen seventy-one police interview where he confessed to the murder was not admissible.

Mercury made the alleged admission, which was the foundation of the prosecution's case, when he was 17 years old and still a minor under NSW law, and under eighteen months after the child disappeared.

Legislative Disclosure

On the day, Jeremy Buckingham revealed the name of Mercury while protected under legislative immunity.

Guardian Australia is opting not to identify the individual. The suspect could not lawfully be publicly identified during the trial because he was just 15 at the time of the alleged crime.

Legislative Intervention

Before Buckingham disclosing the identity, the president of the upper house of NSW, Ben Franklin, interrupted him. He inquired if the member was about to divulge the identity, which is currently required to be suppressed by legal order.

The president said: “May I just make these observations before you proceed under privilege, a member is shielded from the consequences which would otherwise result from violating a court order of this kind, which could otherwise amount to a legal offense.”

“However, all members have the responsibility to use their privilege judiciously, and this house can take measures against members who are deemed by the house to have abused privilege. The cooperation between the parliament and the judiciary should not be taken for granted, and I urge the member to consider these matters thoroughly before continuing.”

Relatives Demand

The revelation of the suspect's identity has occurred after the toddler's family gave an extraordinary ultimatum to the individual last week – consent to meet with them by midnight Wednesday or Buckingham would reveal his identity in parliament.

They also presented a dossier which holds the confession the suspect made when he was seventeen, as stated by Buckingham.

Case Revived

Law enforcement restarted the case after a 2011 inquest finding ruled that Grimmer was dead and recommended that authorities reinvestigate.

Mercury was taken into custody in March 2018, and was then in his 60s. He was freed a later after the interrogation was ruled unacceptable.

Without it, the NSW prosecuting authority found there was inadequate proof for the proceedings to continue.

Confession Details

During the trial, the tribunal heard that during an interview with officers in the early 1970s, Mercury had admitted to murdering the toddler, telling officers he had intended to have “sexual intercourse” with the child before allegedly killing her.

Legal Decision

But Justice Robert Allan Hulme decided the interview could not be used as evidence in the trial.

In his judgment in the high court, the justice said the questioning was inadmissible because of the way in which it was carried out and the specific vulnerability of the accused at the time.

“No parent, adult or legal practitioner was in attendance at any point of the police interview,” the justice said.

He heard testimony from two psychiatrists who agreed that the teenager had a below average intelligence, was immature and more vulnerable than the typical teenager.

Background of the Defendant

The tribunal heard the suspect had a difficult connection with his family, a history of running away from home, moving countries, low intellect and restricted education.

The prosecution submitted that at the time of the questioning, there were no mandatory requirements or standards for an adult support person to be present when interviewing juveniles.

The other evidence before the judge was made up of records from the time and reports from 1970-71, obtained from his involvement with the youth legal system.