🔗 Share this article

I have some thoughts regarding the comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the New York major last eight. Look – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and athletic competitions frequently encourage patriotic sentiment. Some letdown was appropriate. Rather, Fowler invoked the continued drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the next round, who he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, versus him the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the next round). Fritz stated in press after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the chance to beat the top three players in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he might take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class serve and concussive strength on both forehand and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat the majority of opponents on the professional circuit. Against the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has seen the interesting emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a drop shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

The American has made a number of significant, unexpected improvements throughout his career. Early on of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate mentioning the continuing slump of US male players lifting grand slams when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very last eight match ought to have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had saved a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after break point, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz eventually did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle peripheral to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive energy to prevail. Down set points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately committed two errors. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a result of needing to hit too many second serves.

The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough experience and tactical know-how to compensate for quite a bit of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the strategy he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for America failing to spawn a male major champion since the last American titlist feels unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” Fritz informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not a failure if he does not fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for all other players. {